TEXT
OF PRESIDING BISHOP’S ORIENTATION ADDRESS
Episcopal
News Service
Presentation to General Convention
The Most Reverend Frank T. Griswold
July 29, 2003

Presiding Bishop, The Most Rev. Frank T. Griswold receives applause as he
addresses
bishops and deputies at an orientation session in Minneapolis July 29.
(ENS photo by Jim DeLa)
My dear
brothers and sisters: we have long anticipated this moment, this
privileged time during which we will seek, as best we can – knowing we are
fallible and finite human beings – to discern God’s desire for this
curious yet wonderful household we call the Episcopal Church. We come
from various dioceses, and congregations within those dioceses – each with
their own particular culture and point of view. And we need one another.
We need the gift of one another’s perspective, one another’s way of
articulating the Gospel and seeking to be faithful, because Christ is
present among us all, and each of us holds within the love of God’s
calling to us, some aspect of God’s truth that is seeking to be enlarged
in communion with others. What a solemn and hopeful moment this is: full
of possibility.
The first
General Convention I attended was in this very city in 1976. I was a new
deputy from the Diocese of Pennsylvania. Quite frankly, it was a
profoundly disorienting experience. I had never been with so many
Episcopalians in one place possessed of so many points of view.
Furthermore, I was made a sergeant-at-arms and told that my function was
to discipline unruly members of the assembly. One evening the members of
the Pennsylvania deputation presented me with a football helmet and a
toilet plunger, thinking that these particular items might be useful in
some way as I performed my duties.
More
seriously, I remember a deputy from the Diocese of Dallas: Ralph Spence,
Sr. who had come, by his own admission, to vote against the adoption of
the new Prayer Book. You can imagine my surprise when, in the course of
the Convention, he stood up as a member of the Prayer Book and Liturgy
Committee and urged us to adopt the very book he had come to defeat. This
was for me a cautionary tale. Many of us arrive at General Convention with
fully formed opinions and a clear sense of what we think ought to happen.
And yet, as we listen to one another, as our rough edges are knocked off
by one another, as we participate in various debates, and committee
meetings and random conversations, something larger than our own
perspective overtakes us. Possibly it is the larger vision of the Spirit.
And our attitude and perspectives, and indeed our firmly held notions of
what should happen, are enlarged.
After Mr.
Spence had delivered his speech he added that he didn’t know what he was
going to tell his wife about this change of heart when he got home. John
Coburn, the then president of the House of Deputies, leaned into the
microphone and, in his wonderfully wry and gentle way, said: “Do give our
regards to Mrs. Spence,” at which point the deputies burst into laughter,
including Mr. Spence. I have heard since from John Coburn that Mrs. Spence
loved that story.
So this
is just one example of how important it is for us to hold ourselves open
to what God may be up to. Perhaps the most important thing we can do is to
lay down some of our certitude in favor of the ever-unfolding truth of
God, which comes to us from the Spirit of truth, who is always guiding us
more deeply into the mystery of Christ and God’s strange and unpredictable
ways.
Let us
not overlook the fact that the life of this Convention is rooted and
grounded in daily encounter with the risen Christ in word and sacrament.
And let us also be mindful of the fact that we are being upheld in prayer
by brothers and sisters who are across this land, and in other parts of
our Communion, and very likely also by many saints in heaven and on earth.
As we
come together we bring with us a number of emotions. We bring with us
hope and possibility, and also anxiety. What some among us see as the
discovery of God’s larger purposes, others see as threats to the integrity
of the Gospel. It is therefore extremely important, no matter what our
point of view may be, that we receive one another and the perspectives we
bring with profound respect, recognizing that each of us, whether we like
it or not, through baptism is a much loved member and limb of Christ’s
risen body. None of us – to echo the words of St. Paul – can say to
another “I have no need of you.” This is perhaps the greatest challenge
before us, and perhaps our greatest opportunity to receive the
unimaginable gifts of God’s love for us through each other.
The focus
of this Convention is engaging God’s mission. And what is God’s mission?
Our Prayer Book makes it quite clear that the mission of the church, which
is, of course, God’s mission, is to restore all people to unity with God
and each other in Christ. This work of reconciliation embraces all things
and involves us personally, as congregations, dioceses, a national church
and a worldwide Communion, and also focuses us on the world. The Son of
God came among us not to save the church but the world. Therefore
reconciliation, the mission of the church, God’s work, is global in scope
and embraces the whole creation. Here I am put in mind of Jesus’ words in
the Gospel of John: and I when I am lifted up from the earth will draw all
to myself.
As we
come together, it is important that we ask ourselves this question: what
is our particular charism as Anglican Christians at this moment in
history? We might begin by looking at how we find ourselves right now. In
other words, what sort of church is gathering? Looking at these questions
might give some indication of the shape, and spirit and potential fruit of
these next ten days. I have been the Presiding Bishop and Primate of the
Episcopal Church for nearly six years now, and I want to tell you briefly
something of what I have learned about who we are together as limbs and
members of Christ’s risen body.
Everywhere I go I have seen what I like to call graced confidence: the
people of our church are focused on mission. Amazing things are happening
in the name of Christ all around our church. And, more and more we are
reaching out to share our tradition, the truth as in Jesus, the story of
how God is acting in our lives. The 20/20 movement serves us well in
naming the mission energies all around the church, and in so doing I
believe greater energies are being released and we are further empowered
to reach out to a world crying out for repair. Episcopalians are actively
engaged in matters of public policy and social justice. We are committed
to overcoming the sin of racism within ourselves, within our church, and
within our society. We have also been on the forefront of work on debt
relief, on HIV/AIDS, environmental stewardship, ethical decision making
around matters of life and death, and peace making in many of the troubled
places around our world. Simply taking note of the matters that will be
before us over these next ten days gives us an incredible indication of
the breadth, and the depth, of our concerns as a church.
And of
course, not everyone has the same passions. That is the wonder of it; we
each have our own unique call and particular gifts, and during this time
we can inform and inspire one another for the engaging of God’s project.
It is
also my sense that we want to do more. I am very gratified and inspired by
the stewardship of our dioceses and congregations in support of the
mission opportunities that surround them. I might say here that, at the
same time, I am concerned that there is no national effort at fund raising
to enhance the work of dioceses and congregations. Further, we make very
little effort to cultivate the large gifts that are never received at
local levels. It is my sense that a national church has a particular
responsibility for this kind of endeavor.
By the
time I leave office in 2006, I believe we must be able better to support
the mission we share by having in place an ongoing, long term, development
effort functioning at the national level. This kind of effort needs to be
part of the consciousness of the church, last into the future, and help
provide for the future.
In this
triennium, the Executive Council determined the wisdom of beginning to
look at a plan or process for mission funding. I will ask the new
Executive Council to enter a discussion about how we might best explore
the establishment of an ongoing national development effort we now lack.
As well, I am personally going to test whether there are donors who stand
ready to support the national mission of our church.
We
receive an important part of our identity by being members of the
worldwide Anglican Communion. I have traveled to other parts of the
Communion and have come to know our Anglican partners in their own
contexts with all the overwhelming issues of life and death with which
they live day by day. This has made me value evermore the fact that we
are not a church unto ourselves but part of a worldwide fellowship called
to bear one another’s burdens and, in the words of St. Paul, so fulfill
the law the Christ. With this in mind we are particularly blessed by the
presence of our guests from various parts of our Communion who are here
with us at this Convention. A very warm welcome to you all.
Professor
David Ford of Cambridge University has provided theological reflections
for the past several meetings of the primates of the Anglican Communion.
During one of our gatherings he said that we are in the process of
becoming a communion. I see more and more that communion is not a human
construction but a gift from God which involves not only our relationships
to one another on earth, but our being drawn by the Holy Spirit into the
eternal life of communion which belongs to the Holy Trinity. We are
discovering in fits and starts what it means to live in communion, and our
communion is always impaired, because of our limited understanding of
God’s ways and because of our human sinfulness. However, we have been
baptized into one body and maintaining communion is therefore a sacred
obligation. In practicing the communion Christ has prepared for us, we
are opened ever anew to receive the endless mercy and holiness of the
Trinity. I say this knowing very well indeed that living in communion is
not always easy and requires of us all a deep desire to understand the
different ways in which we seek to be faithful to the Gospel.
Declarations of being “in” or “out” of communion may assuage our own
fears, or our angers, but they do not reflect the gospel. They do not
show our broken and needy world that at the heart of the gospel there is a
reconciling love that seeks to embrace our passionately held opinions and
transcend them all. Christ, writes St. Paul, died for all, so that those
who live might live no longer for themselves, but for him who died and was
raised for them.
So, this
is some of my sense of who we are and who we are called to be as we engage
God’s mission and open ourselves to further ways of articulating the good
news of God in Christ.
At this
particular moment, it might be also be instructive to remember that we are
inheritors of a theological tradition born out of conflict. The 16th
century was a difficult time in which opposing theological points of view
warred with one another. On the one hand there were the values of the
Catholic tradition, and on the other the passions of zealous reformers.
Each group was sure that the truth was theirs. However, in the context of
common prayer, and a joint yielding to the yoke of Christ mediated by word
and sacrament, these opposing points of view found the place of their
reconciliation, and gave birth to the Anglican tradition. This was not
because either won over the other, but because God graced them to step
beyond their positions and recognize one another as brothers and sisters
in the breaking of the bread. The genius of Anglicanism was to contain
divergent and passionately held points of view. This capacity to contain
difference within a context of common prayer is who we as Anglicans are
called to be. And this is the charism we bring to this present moment.
These
Anglican sensibilities are particularly needed in a world dominated by
notions of winning or losing, yes or no, either/or. Unfortunately we are
not immune to the ways of the world, and the thinking that so dominates
our culture spills over into our community of faith. And yet, I deeply
believe that having the mind of Christ means we are able to see reality
not as either/or but as both/and. Both/and thinking is reflected in
Christian orthodoxy at its best. Here I think of the classical doctrine
of the nature of Christ established in the fifth century when heresies
which held that Christ was either human or divine were overruled by a
church council that chose the route of both/and, declaring Christ to be
both fully human and fully divine. The logic of the heretics was
overruled by the paradox of orthodoxy.
Of
course, practically speaking: we will say yes or no on many matters over
these next days. Some of them have the potential to be very divisive.
Predictably, the topic of homosexuality has received the most media
attention prior to our coming together, and has also been a focus of some
of our internal life. I am very aware that there is a great deal of energy
on the part of those with various views of the question. Some perceive
this as an absolutely decisive moment, and the time for resolving all of
the pertinent issues about homosexuality in the life of the church. Here I
think it is important that we remind ourselves that the church is always,
in some sense, becoming the church, and is continuing to grow toward
maturity in Christ. Therefore, anything we do or decide is partial and
incomplete, though we hope and pray that it reflects something of the
truth into which the Holy Spirit is always seeking to guide us. My prayer
is that this Convention will be part of a continuing process of discovery
and growth.
I note
here that the Theology Committee of the House of Bishops produced a report
called The Gift of Sexuality: A Theological Perspective. The report was
offered to the church by the bishops for study and reflection. It does
not seek to provide an answer to the question of homosexuality in the life
of the church. Rather, it seeks to describe how the church behaves as the
church in the face of deeply held contrary points of view, both of which
perceive themselves as reflecting the mind of Christ.
It is my
own conviction that different points of view can be held in tension within
the church without issues of sexuality becoming church dividing. Others
may disagree but this is my firmly held point of view. This is also the
view of the House of Bishops Theology Committee and of the International
Anglican Conversation on Human Sexuality that I convened following the
Lambeth Conference of 1998 at the request of the Archbishop of
Canterbury. This international group included twelve bishops and primates
who represented a broad range of views and met over a three-year period.
Their conclusion was that if matters of homosexuality were to divide the
Communion, it would be, to quote from the report, “the ultimate
sexualization of the Church, making sexuality more powerful, or more
claiming of our attention, than God.”
We have
heard people on both sides of a number of contentious questions say that
their particular view is in accordance with Scripture, whereas the
opposing view is not. There is no such thing as a neutral reading of
Scripture. While we all accept the authority of Scripture, we interpret
various passages in different ways. It is extremely dishonoring of the
faith of another to dismiss them as not taking the Bible seriously. Let us
be clear that we can all agree that, in the words of the ordination oath,
“we believe the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be the
Word of God and to contain all things necessary to salvation.”
In
addition, I think it is terribly important that we keep our perspective
large and focused on God’s mission for the whole church. It is easy for
one or two issues so to dominate the horizon that other aspects of what it
means to be the people of God, living the rigors of the Gospel, are
overshadowed or lost. Whenever we find our hearts and minds profoundly
dominated by some thought, it is often helpful to pause and test the
spirits, as St. John recommends. In this age of instant communication,
and superficial analysis that sometimes accompanies it, the possibility of
the whole landscape being taken over by what most tugs at emotions is even
greater. It is up to us all to make sure that this does not happen. Be
aware: we have that choice. We have that freedom. And I believe we have
that responsibility.
As I said
at the outset, we have been provided with a solemn and hopeful moment,
full of possibility. Paul describes the church in Corinth as “God’s
field,” a field ripe with potentiality and the possibility of
fruitfulness. In a profound sense this General Convention is God’s field
in which God not only sows but seeks to produce a rich harvest.
I want to
say a word here about the ministry I exercise as your Presiding Bishop and
Primate, and particularly as your Chief Pastor. Mine is a ministry of
encouragement in which I call us all, including myself, to step beyond our
deeply held perspectives and fears and to risk a genuine encounter with
Christ in the other, in the full force of their otherness and contrary
perspectives.
I also
see myself as being a minister of connection and communion. I believe we
are called to bring all voices together in one conversation, acknowledging
the fact that truth is discovered in communion, in community, and none of
us possesses the fullness of Christ’s truth. We need one another to
enlarge, and in some instances challenge, one another’s more limited and
often self-serving notions of the truth.
I have my
own points of view, to be sure, and some have been disappointed that I
have not expressed them more forthrightly. I, however, have felt that I am
called to be the servant of the community as it struggles to discern
evermore deeply the truth as it is in Christ. Though I pray that I might
be given the mind of Christ, I am profoundly aware that, along with the
apostle Paul, now I see in a mirror dimly. Now I know only in part. That
in the face of this unknowing I must cling to the fact that faith, hope
and love abide, these three, and the greatest of these is love. My
deepest desire is to be in some small way a minister of the divine agape
which can overrule all our disagreements, all our sinfulness, and make us
one in the profound charity which is the inner life of God the holy
Trinity.
During
these past months a prayer has crossed my path from several sources, which
made me feel that the prayer was meant to become my own. It is the prayer
of Philaret, a Russian bishop of Moscow in the 19th Century, and I pray it
now with you at the beginning of this Convention.
Lord, grant me to greet the coming day in peace.
Help me in all things to rely on your holy will.
In every hour of the day reveal your will to me.
Teach me to treat all that comes to me throughout the day with peace of
soul, and with firm conviction that your will governs everything.
In all my deeds and words guide my thoughts and feelings.
In unforeseen events let me not forget that all are sent by you.
Teach me to act firmly and wisely, without embittering and embarrassing
others.
Give me the strength to bear the fatigue of the coming day with all that
it shall bring.
Direct my will. Teach me to pray. Pray yourself in me.
May God
indeed guide us in the days ahead, and may we be given the grace to act
firmly and wisely without embittering and embarrassing others. And in
every hour of the day, and in every decision we are called to make, may
God in Christ through the agency of the Holy Spirit reveal God’s deepest
desire and give us the courage and strength to live it for the sake of the
world. May we also emerge from our time together strengthened in our own
faith, renewed by the power of God’s reconciling love, and changed in ways
that at this point can hardly be imagined. May God’s love ever more
deeply convert us. May Christ ever more fully engage us in the ongoing
work of reconciliation. And may God the Holy Spirit ever more completely
pray within us the joyful unity of Christ’s risen life.
Thank
you.